Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Species:
mouse
Strain:
Balb/c
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Breeding farm VELAZ s.r.o., Koleč u Kladna, Czech Republic
- Age at study initiation: 8 - 10 wks
- Weight at study initiation: 18.1 - 21.9 g
- Housing: macrolon cages
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +- 3
- Humidity (%): 30 – 70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12

Vehicle:
other: DAE 433
Concentration:
mixture of 40% dimethylacetamide, 30% acetone and 30% ethanol
No. of animals per dose:
5
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- Compound solubility: emulsion, TS 30 %
- Irritation: no
- Lymph node proliferation response: not examined


MAIN STUDY
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Criteria used to consider a positive response (on primary proliferation of lymphocytes by incorporation of 3H-methyl thymidine)
Stimulation index (SI) is ≥ 3
Response increases in dose-related manner
Criteria for irritation potential: individual and mean ear weight


TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION:
Days 1-3: 25 µL test suspension in DAE 433 , 1x on day 1, 2, and 3
Days 4 and 5: no treatment
Day 6: Injection of 250 μL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 7.5 x105 Bq (c. 21 µCi) of 3H-methyl thymidine
into all test and control mice via the tail vein. Five hours later, the animals were killed.



Positive control substance(s):
other: DNCB (dinitrochlorbenzene, 0.5% (w/v) solution)
Statistics:
Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test, and then the non-parametric two-group Mann-Whitney rank test (probability level 0.05) was applied to all two-group comparisons [using software Statgraphic ® Centurion (version XV, USA)].
Parameter:
SI
Remarks on result:
other: Concentration = 0.3% / 3% / 30% SI = 1.42 / 4.22 / 5.88 EC3 = 1.82 % Details see Table 2 below
Parameter:
other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
Remarks on result:
other: Concentration / 0.3% / 3% / 30% Group mean / 857 / 2538 / 3534 Details see Table 1 below

Table 1: Individual and mean radioactivity in cell suspensions (Report Table 4)

Activity (DPM, rounded)

Animal No.

NC

(1-5)

PC

(6-10)

30%

(11-15)

3%

(16-20)

0.3%

(21-25)

1

599

8066

2980

2659

1002

2

536

6900

4845

1995

852

3

795

6625

3250

2267

815

4

549

6332

3426

3283

856

5

527

6804

3171

2485

758

 Group

mean

601

6946

3534

2538

857

SI

1.00

11.55

5.88

4.22

1.42

NC = vehicle control; PC = positive control

Table 2: Individual and average ear weights (Report Table 5)

Weight of ear biopsies (milligrams)

Animal No.

NC

(1-6)

PC

(7-12)

30%

(13-18)

3%

(19-24)

0.3%

(25-30)

1

23.2

27.6

25.5

24.4

21.7

2

24.6

38.3

23.3

23.3

22.7

3

22.0

30.4

28.1

23.7

20.4

 4

23.2

35.5

25.8

23.8

21.3

5

22.9

29.5

26.6

24.0

21.8

 Group mean

23.18

32.26*

25.86*

23.86*

21.58

SD

0.93

4.16

1.75

0.37

0.83

NC = vehicle control; PC = positive control

* statistically significant with p =< 0.05, Mann-Whitney test

Table 3:  Summary table (Report Table 6)

Group

Radioisotope incorporation

in lymph nodes (rounded)

Ear weight

Mean DPM

SI

Mean (mg)

NC

601

1.0

23.18

PC

6946

11.55+

32.26*

30%

3534

5.88+

25.86*

3%

2538

4.22+

23.86

0.3%

857

1.42

21.58

Bold figures with + = values >= 3

NC = vehicle control; PC = positive control

Interpretation of results:
sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Wash oil considered to exhibit a clear sensitising potential in the LLNA, supported by the fact that a significant stimulatory effect was observed at a low dose (3 %) that failed to produce visible irritation.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (sensitising)
Additional information:

High doses of wash oil (3 and 30 %) induced a weak but dose-related increase in lymphocyte proliferation in the LLNA assay (SI = 4.22 and 5.88, respectively) without evidence of an irritating potential. The finding is not considered to be a false positive result. Hence, wash oil should be regarded as a potential skin sensitiser: The EC3 is 1.82 % (calculated by interpolation), hence wash oil is to be classified as Skin Sens. 1A according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008.


Migrated from Short description of key information:
In a mouse local lymph node assay, creosote oil, acenaphthene fraction (wash oil) showed a sensitising effect with an EC3 < 2.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Due to the positive result in the LLNA with EC3 of 1.82 % (i.e. below the cut-off limit of 2 %), wash oil has to be classified as skin sensitiser Cat. 1A (criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008).