Adopted opinions and previous consultations on applications for authorisation

Adopted opinions and previous consultations on applications for authorisation

Adopted opinions and previous consultations on applications for authorisation

This page provides further information on the applications for authorisation or review reports, which have undergone consultation. The applications for authorisation are in the opinion development phase until the final opinions of the Committees for Risk Assessment and Socio-economic Analysis have been adopted and sent to the European Commission. Its decision-making process can be followed through the comitology register, where further information is published about the REACH Committee's past and upcoming meetings.

On 1 February 2020, the United Kingdom (UK) withdrew from the EU. The transition period provided by the withdrawal agreement ended on 31 December 2020. As of 1 January 2021, an application for an authorisation submitted by a person established in the UK (except Northern Ireland) is no longer valid in the EU, unless that application has been transferred to a legal entity established in the EU or Northern Ireland before the end of the transition period. Therefore, authorisation applications and decisions in so far as these concern persons established in the UK (except Northern Ireland) are no longer considered valid. 

 

There are currently no ongoing consultations.
 
0072-01 Initial Chromium trioxide 215-607-8 1333-82-0 Souriau sas
“Amphenol Limited – [Decision discontinued as of 01/01/2021]
AMPHENOL SOCAPEX
ITT Cannon GmbH
Connecteurs Electriques Deutsch
TE UK Ltd – [Decision discontinued as of 01/01/2021]
Industrial use of a mixture containing hexavalent chromium compounds for the conversion of cadmium coated circular and rectangular connectors in order to achieve a higher level of performances than the requirements of international standards as well as to withstand harsh environments and high safety applications (such as in the military, aeronautic, aerospace, mining, offshore and nuclear industries or for the application in safety devices for road vehicles, rolling stock and vessels). Commission decided Details
0071-01 Initial Chromium trioxide 215-607-8 1333-82-0 Gerhardi Kunststofftechnik GmbH

C. Hübner GmbH

SAXONIA Galvanik GmbH

Simon Systems GmbH & Co. KG [name of co-applicant in the original application: Karl Simon GmbH & Co. KG updated due to a notified legal entity name change]

Galvanoplast Fischer Bohemia, s.r.o. [correction of the name of the original Applicant: Fischer GmbH & Co. surface technologies KG and of the successor Applicant: Fischer Surface Technologies GmbH]

Fischer Oberflächentechnologie GmbH [correction of the name of the original Applicant: Fischer GmbH & Co. surface technologies KG and of the successor Applicant: Fischer Surface Technologies GmbH]

WAFA Germany GmbH

Boryszew Oberflächentechnik Deutschland GmbH

Winning Plastics – Diepersdorf GmbH [application transferred from “Bolta Werke GmbH” due to a notified legal entity change.]

Heinze Gruppe GmbH

C+C Krug GmbH

BIA Kunststoff- und Galvanotechnik GmbH & Co KG

Aludec Galvanic s.a.
Plating on Plastics for Automotive Applications (PoPAA) Commission decided Details
0070-02 Initial Chromium trioxide 215-607-8 1333-82-0 FN HERSTAL S.A.
BROWNING VIANA, FABRICA DE ARMAS E ARTIGOS DE DESPORTO SA
Industrial use of chromium trioxide in the hard chromium coating of civilian firearms barrel bores and auxiliary parts subject to thermal, mechanical and chemical stresses, in order to provide a low friction coefficient as well as heat, corrosion and wear resistance properties. Commission decided Details
0070-01 Initial Chromium trioxide 215-607-8 1333-82-0 FN HERSTAL S.A.
MANROY ENGINEERING LTD – [Decision discontinued as of 01/01/2021]
Industrial use of chromium trioxide in the hard chromium coating of military small- and medium-caliber firearms barrel bores and auxiliary parts subject to thermal, mechanical and chemical stresses, in order to provide hardness, heat resistance and thermal barrier properties, as well as corrosion resistance, adhesion and low friction properties Commission decided Details
0069-01 Initial Chromium trioxide 215-607-8 1333-82-0 Topocrom GmbH TOPOCROM functional chrome plating in closed reactor systems for the establishment of adjustable hemispherical surface structures. Commission decided Details
0068-01 Initial Chromium trioxide 215-607-8 1333-82-0 Hoogovens Court Roll Surface Technologies V.O.F.
WAVEC GmbH
Trattamento Cilindri Laminazione S.r.l.
Walzen-Service-Center GmbH
NORD CHROME SAS
RHENAROLL SA
Texturing Technology Limited – [Decision discontinued as of 01/01/2021]
NC POLAND Sp.z. o.o.
Functional chrome plating of work rolls used in the steel and aluminium industry. Commission decided Details
0067-01 Initial Chromium trioxide 215-607-8 1333-82-0 Abloy Oy Use of chromium trioxide in electroplating of mechanical and electromechanical cylinders, cam- and padlocks, electromechanical lock cases and architectural hardware. Commission decided Details
0066-02 Initial Chromium trioxide 215-607-8 1333-82-0 MTU Aero Engines AG Surface treatment for aerospace applications for civil and military uses, comprising treatment of new components for aircraft engines as well as maintenance, repair and overhaul work on aircraft engine components, unrelated to functional chrome plating Commission decided Details
0066-01 Initial Chromium trioxide 215-607-8 1333-82-0 MTU Aero Engines AG Functional chrome plating for aerospace applications for civil and military uses, comprising coating of new components for aircraft engines as well as maintenance, repair and overhaul work on aircraft engine components Commission decided Details
0065-01 Initial Chromium trioxide 215-607-8 1333-82-0 Safran Aircraft Engines [name of applicant in the original application: SNECMA updated due to a notified change of corporate name] Industrial use of a chromium trioxide based surface treatment mixture applied on safety-critical rotating components of commercial and military aircraft engines, whose failure endangers airworthiness Commission decided Details